Before we get into this, I just want to make it clear that I'm still philosophizing, and I am not 100% sure about all of this. My philosophies do change from time to time (you can see examples in the update log at the root page), and so I'm not certain that the below list is entirely right.

Protagonism uses a virtue-ethics-like system where a number of virtuous behaviors are established, and an action's moral merit (the value that actually determines how good a person is) is based on its exhibition of these behaviors and the temptation overcome to do it (no temptation or negative temptation means the act is not virtuous at all). More rigorously, the formulas are:

One more thing about vice: obviously, to compare virtue and vice, these formulas require us to establish a "baseline" 1:1 ratio of viciousness to temptation. This ratio is exemplified by the act of causing X suffering to another in a way that doesn't violate their rights (this could be done with emotional suffering for example) to gain X pleasure for yourself when the two of you are offset in faring just so that the emotional factors pertaining to inequality would balance out exactly. As per the virtue formula, any good act that requires a sacrifice of X magnitude puts you back to moral neutrality, regardless of how much effect it has.

One thing I need to make clear is the rule of prudence: when necessary, sacrifice any of the below goals in the short-term for the long-term strategic interests of the cause (ie. of making up for it later). This isn't on the list because it doesn't get weighed against the others; it oversees the others.

However, I believe that things closer to the present are worth more than things farther in the future. This is the reason for the occasional apparent exceptions to prudence I make, such as any situation where you give up reusable power for a sufficiently large good effect that won't ripple into the future. Without this principle, it would seem that a good person should devote all of their effort to accruing power so they can do more good in the future (or pass on the power to someone who will), and never give any thought to helping people in the short-term, since there's no telling how long the world will be here and it has a positive feedback loop where the more power good people get over the world the easier it becomes to gain more and so this would always be the best investment.

Now, a few definitions before we get going:

And finally, the list.

(The reason I didn't list Courage or any similar concept is because that falls under resisting temptation. Being brave isn't a goal of its own; it just makes the other virtues more admirable.)

Another thing I need to say is the rule of reverence or soldiarity: since the above goals are about caring about things, there's also a calling to avoid indulgence while horrible things are happening even if it's beyond your power to immediately act. For example, it would count as a sin against Compassion to eat candy while the innocent suffer around you. See the articles on emotions and miscellaneous psychology insights for more exploration of this.

I also would like to point out something elegant about the virtue list: Fecundity is Ambition for others, like Liberation is Uncontainability for others. You can see how the two complement each other: acquiring freedom and using it. And Honesty and Equity can perhaps be understood as corresponding to Rationality. I'm sure there's more here to realize.