yujiri.xyz

Software

Breadth-first versus depth-first autocompletion

I've seen two approaches taken to autocompletion in shells and similar environments:

Micro

I prefer breadth-first because:

Some environments, like fish, use breadth-first completion but move into depth-first if you continue to press tab after a completion that didn't give you a full possibility. This is obviously better than having only one available, but if I only get one, I definitely prefer breadth-first.

Fish review

Proxied content from gemini://yujiri.xyz/software/tab-completion.gmi

Gemini request details:

Original URL
gemini://yujiri.xyz/software/tab-completion.gmi
Status code
Success
Meta
text/gemini; lang=en
Proxied by
kineto

Be advised that no attempt was made to verify the remote SSL certificate.

What is Gemini?